搜索结果: 1-15 共查到“统计学 Discussion”相关记录21条 . 查询时间(0.083 秒)
Discussion of "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" by A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan and M. Ribatet
Discussion "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan and M. Ribatet M. Ribatet
2012/9/17
We congratulate the authors for producing such a helpful and comprehensive overview paper of a ra-pidly developing and important area. The starting point for inference in spatial extreme value prob-le...
Discussion of "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" by A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan and M. Ribatet
Discussion "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan M. Ribatet
2012/9/17
The review paper on spatial extremes by Davison,Padoan and Ribatet is a most welcome contribu-tion. The authors cover quite a lot of ground, mak-ing connections between different approaches while high...
Discussion of "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" by A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan and M. Ribatet
Discussio "Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes" A. C. Davison, S. A. Padoan M. Ribatet
2012/9/17
We congratulate the authors for their overview paper discussing modeling techniques for spatial ex-tremes. There is great interest in spatial extreme
data in the atmospheric science community, as the...
Discussion of "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" by J. J. Goeman and A. Solari
Discussion "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" Goeman A. Solari
2012/9/17
Closure-based multiple testing procedures for con-trolling the familywise error rate (FWER) have been around for decades, but they have not been well un-derstood, and hence have been under-appreciated...
Discussion of "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" by J. J. Goeman and A. Solari
Discussion "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" Goeman A. Solari
2012/9/17
I want to congratulate the authors on this thought-provoking and important paper on multiple testing in exploratory settings.Standard Multiple Testing procedures can appear very mechanistic. Hypothese...
Discussion of "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" by J. J. Goeman and A. Solari
Discussion "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" Goeman A. Solari
2012/9/17
Goeman and Solari [Statist. Sci.26 (2011) 584–597] have addressed the interesting topic of multiple testing for exploratory re-search, and provided us with nice suggestions for exploratory analysis.Th...
Discussion of "Statistical Inference: The Big Picture" by R. E. Kass
Discussion Statistical Inference The Big Picture R. E. Kass
2011/7/6
Rob Kass presents a fascinating vision of a “post”-Bayes/frequentist-controversy world in which prac-tical utility of statistical models is the guiding prin-ciple for statistical inference.
Discussion of "Statistical Inference: The Big Picture" by R. E. Kass
Discussion Statistical Inference Big Picture R. E. Kass
2011/7/5
Kass states (page 5) that Figure 3 is not a good general description of statistical inference and that Figure 1 is more accurate. I completely agree. Kass states (page 5) that “It is important for stu...
Discussion of "Statistical Inference: The Big Picture" by R. E. Kass
Discussion Statistical Inference The Big Picture R. E. Kass
2011/7/5
In this piece, Rob Kass brings to bear his insights from a long career in both theoretical and applied statistics to reflect on the disconnect between what we teach and what we do.
Discussion of: A statistical analysis of multiple temperature proxies: Are reconstructions of surface temperatures over the last 1000 years reliable?
reconstructions of surface temperatures statistical analysis
2011/6/17
McShane andWyner (2011) (henceforthMW) analyze a dataset of “proxy”
climate records previously used by Mann et al. (2008) (henceforth M08) to
attempt to assess their utility in reconstructing past t...
Discussion of: A statistical analysis of multiple temperature proxies: Are reconstructions of surface temperatures over the last 1000 years reliable?
reconstructions of surface temperatures statistical analysis paleoclimate reconstructions
2011/6/16
As McShane and Wyner (2011) observe, there are formidable statistical
problems in “reconstructing” past temperatures from networks of so-called
“proxy” data with weak “signal” and complicated autoco...
Discussion of: A statistical analysis of multiple temperature proxies: Are reconstructions of surface temperatures over the last 1000 years reliable?
reconstructions of surface temperatures statistical analysis proxy-based reconstruction
2011/6/16
The authors are to be congratulated on the clarity of their paper, which
gives discussants and readers much to sink their teeth into. My comments
are somewhat critical, but this should in no way dev...
Discussion of: A statistical analysis of multiple temperature proxies: Are reconstructions of surface temperatures over the last 1000 years reliable?
statistical analysis reconstructions of surface temperatures application of statistics
2011/6/16
This article (MW) has stimulated much valuable discussion and helped to
focus attention on an important area for the application of statistics. Given
the short amount of space, however, we reluctant...
Discussion of "Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods'' by M. Girolami and B. Calderhead
Riemann manifold Langevin Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods
2010/11/8
This technical report is the union of two contributions to the discussion of the Read Paper Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods (Calderhead and Girolami, 2010), presented in ...
Introducing the discussion paper by Székely and Rizzo
Introducing the discussion paper Székely and Rizzo
2010/10/19
I recall a great sense of excitement in the seminar room in Madison after Professor Sz´ekely presented the astonishing findings about distance covariance (in the spring of 2008). It was one of t...